Wednesday, March 18, 2015

Democrats Stop Bill to Help Human Trafficking Victims Because it Won’t Fund Their Abortions

Proving once again that, for Democrats, abortion trumps everything else in politics, Senate Democrats voted today to stop a bill to help human trafficking victims because the measure won’t pay for their abortions.
The legislation passed through the Senate Judiciary Committee without any problems but, now, pro-abortion activists are raising a stink about how funds for restitution for human trafficking victims won’t pay for abortions. The objection is offensive to victims of human trafficking and millions of girls and young women around the world who are victimized by it, putting abortion ahead of meeting their needs.
Senate Democrats voted against a cloture motion to end the Democratic filibuster and to allow a vote on the sex trafficking bill — with every Republican in the Senate supporting the measure and favoring an end to the filibuster preventing it from moving forward. The final vote was 55-43 against ending the filibuster and the cloture motion needed 60 votes to move the bill ahead to a vote. Only Democratic Senators Donnelly, Casey, Manchin, and Heitkamp voted with Republicans to end debate.
After the first cloture vote, Republicans held a second cloture vote to end debate and Senate Democrats voted a second time to block the bill to help human trafficking victims on a similar 55-43 vote.
Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn, a pro-life Republican, said on the floor of the Senate this morning that he is shocked and dismayed that Democrats would put abortion funding ahead of helping women.
“Children are being abused and literally sexually assaulted while, apparently, some of our colleagues on the other side of the aisle have decided to try to make a political point,” he said. “To our colleagues who are filibustering this legislation, are you prepared to turn your back on the thousands of people living every day in bondage and who are desperately clinging to the hope that someone, someone will lend them a helping hand? Are you prepared to abandon these children and these other victims of human trafficking who deserve a roof over their head, someone to lean on, and somehow, some way to get a fresh start in life?”
Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell said that, as a result of their vote holding up the bill,Republicans will not allow a vote on pro-abortion Attorney General nominee Loretta Lynch. McConnell indicated his intention to keep the Senate focused on this human trafficking legislation until its successful completion.  Further cloture votes to break the filibuster are expected throughout this week.
ACTION: See below to find out how your senators voted.
Leading pro-life groups hammered Democrats for their misplaced priorities.
Family Research Council President Tony Perkins said “this bill was created to rescue victims — not create more. If Planned Parenthood and other groups are so determined to give women access to abortion, why don’t they donate the funds to pay for the abortions?”
“In a stunning display of protecting abortion at all costs, the US Senate failed to defend victims – women and little girls – of sex trafficking,” said Students for Life of America president Kristan Hawkins. “The abortion lobby and their allies in the Senate should be ashamed of themselves. How dare they call themselves ‘pro-woman’ when they epically failed to help sex trafficking victims because they would rather force taxpayers to fund abortion. Today’s vote shows that like Planned Parenthood, Senate Democrats are for ‘Abortion. No Matter What’.”
“Young girls and women shouldn’t be sentenced to the horrors of human trafficking and sex slavery,” added Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel Casey Mattox. “Withholding help for these girls and women in desperate need for any reason is tragic, but holding that help hostage because it doesn’t include abortion funding is downright wicked.”


  1. Poison pill provisions included in legislation for strictly political reasons are nothing new. Articles like this one are part of the propaganda/misinformation campaign that keeps the citizenry upset, distracted and ignorant.

  2. So if these sex slaves have been impregnated by johns before being freed by the federal government, they're supposed to keep the babies? You guys want to think that one through?

  3. Guess the author of this "piece" is Pro-Life. At least from title which, kept me from finding out otherwise. To the author, MOST Americans/Humans are Pro-Choice in cases like this! I mean really, think about what this provision would do to victims.

  4. I'm pretty sure they can pay for their abortion using some of the cash assistance they're getting.